National Chicle is the art set of baseball this year. And I'm all for an art set. I'm also okay with preferring some artists' work over others. That what art is. Pablo Picasso and Jackson Pollock both worked in different styles and appeal to different people. Baseball cards, art-based or not, can have the same affect. While I love realistic portraits, I also hope there's some crazy stylistic choices made by the artist (within reason, of course. I'm still wondering why Chipper Jones and Babe Ruth are being compared). Hell, give me some abstract baseball cards. I can handle it. But why does it need to be under the National Chicle banner?

Do the math: expensive paintings + expensive canvas card stock + slowing sales = no more Topps Gallery
But now if it's retro, even if you haven't heard of the cards or collected them before, they sell. Ten years isn't retro yet, so no resurrection of Topps Gallery. However if it was to become a convoluted mess like Stadium Club, I'm okay with the moritorium. Kill this National Chicle stuff so I can see the brand I recognize in a decade or two.

For National Chicle to really catch on, it needs to fully embrace the unique stature the brand brings. Offering a fully painted base set isn't enough. Autographs, jerey cards and Allen & Ginter-esque parallel levels don't do it either. Sketch cards would have made more headway. Give me a whole bunch of nice and/or crazy art that makes a statement beyond Chipper Ruth and I'm all in.
If you want to see some art sets done right (even if they're not baseball), check out Topps' Star Wars Galaxy, Lord of the Rings Masterpieces or Indiana Jones Masterpieces.
1 comment:
Yeah, Chicle is a weird set. SOME of the cards are kinda cool, but others are atrocious (like that Ruth card!)
Post a Comment